Efforts in Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) have gained significant prominence in recent years, with institutions in education, business, and government adopting these frameworks as markers of progress. While representation has visibly improved, structural systems of power and privilege remain largely intact, and backlash has emerged as a persistent obstacle to meaningful change.
The transformative potential of genuine inclusivity is often undermined by backlash, fatigue, and cynicism from both advocates and opponents of EDI. These challenges are compounded by the emotional labour required to advance equity in the face of structural resistance and co-optation.
This panel critically examines how surface-level EDI initiatives perpetuate systemic inequities, provoke resistance, and ultimately hinder transformative outcomes. It further aims to explore strategies to counter backlash, address resistance constructively, and ensure the long-term sustainability of equitable practices.
The limitations of EDI initiatives highlight the need for a critical re-evaluation of their goals, strategies, and resilience in the face of resistance. While representation is an essential first step, it cannot substitute for the deeper work of dismantling systemic inequities and redistributing privilege.
This panel aims to inspire dialogue and foster practical strategies for confronting power structures, addressing resistance, and building a foundation for equitable, inclusive systems. By embracing a transformative and resilient approach, EDI initiatives can fulfil their promise of creating a fairer, more inclusive society for all.
Chair:
Professor Marie-Therese Claes (Expert in cross-cultural management, diversity, and leadership)
Panelists:
1. Sakshi Bansal – Consultant in social impact, organizational change, and inclusive leadership.
2. Severin Hornung – Researcher in organizational psychology, critical management studies, and workplace justice.
3. Karel Čada – Sociologist specializing in social inequalities, diversity policies, and cultural change.
4. Klára Šimáčková Laurenčíková (Czech Government, Commissioner for Human Rights) Advocate for human rights, inclusion, and social justice in public policy.
Key Discussion Points:
1. What forms of resistance do EDI efforts face, and how can they be effectively addressed?
2. How can organizations move from symbolic diversity efforts to deeper structural change?
3. How do advocates sustain engagement and avoid burnout while pushing for change?
4. What practical measures can be taken to ensure that EDI initiatives result in lasting transformation?